Here There and Everywhere

Expat wanderer

But / And

Several years ago I was working for a charismatic leader. He was amazing, he built something out of nothing, and changed countless lives. I felt very privileged to be a part of his team.

I managed a particular program for him, and I raised money for college scholarships so that poor kids, who were smart but had very small chance of going on to university without outside help, would have the promise of a full-tuition paid scholarship if they kept their grades up, stayed drug free, attended cultural events for which we provided free tickets, donated by our very generous sponsors (museums! baseball games! fishing trips! opera! symphony! our sponsors were SO generous!)

From this leader I learned many things, and one sticks with me in my daily life – using “and” instead of “but.”

Here is what he explained to me – when you reply with “but”, you are negating what the previous speaker – or even you, yourself – said. When you use “and” instead of “but”, you open up the possibility of two different things co-existing.

I challenge you to try it.

It will change your life.

Eliminate “but” from your vocabulary. Replace it with “and.” It opens an amazing new world.

Here is an example:

“She wants to go to the mall, but I want to go to the movies.” (Implies that these things are mutually exclusive)
“She wants to go to the mall, and I want to go to the movies.” (Implies we can do both!)

“And” gives room for negotiation, for finding a bigger frame that includes all the wants and needs, with a little co-operation.

I challenge YOU to give it a try. Give it a try for just one day – see how it works. Come back here and tell us how it worked for you.

December 27, 2007 - Posted by | Communication, Community, Family Issues, Language, Living Conditions, Relationships, Spiritual, Words

9 Comments »

  1. but,
    but,
    that’s not fun 😛

    On a more serious note, this is a very lovely concept. Again, the little things in life are what make the difference! He’s brilliant.

    kinano's avatar Comment by kinano | December 27, 2007 | Reply

  2. hmmm, David Koresh?

    Purgatory72's avatar Comment by Purgatory72 | December 27, 2007 | Reply

  3. that is very insightful. i think linguists would definitely agree with you…

    Mrm's avatar Comment by Mrm | December 27, 2007 | Reply

  4. Kinan – brilliant, indeed. I’ve never forgotten it.

    Hmm, Purg, (LLLOOOLLLLLLLL) David Koresh AND scholarships for the underprivileged in the same sentence . .. ?

    Mrm – I dunno, AND it works for me!

    intlxpatr's avatar Comment by intlxpatr | December 27, 2007 | Reply

  5. he must be a libra

    error's avatar Comment by error | December 28, 2007 | Reply

  6. Error – you make the most unusual connections!

    intlxpatr's avatar Comment by intlxpatr | December 28, 2007 | Reply

  7. Yes, I remember that one from my trainings in the job 🙂

    NicoleB's avatar Comment by rainmountain | December 28, 2007 | Reply

  8. Really? Do you remember where it comes from, RM?

    intlxpatr's avatar Comment by intlxpatr | December 28, 2007 | Reply

  9. Nope, we had various trainings and one trainer explained the principle to us.

    NicoleB's avatar Comment by rainmountain | December 29, 2007 | Reply


Leave a reply to Mrm Cancel reply