Here There and Everywhere

Expat wanderer

Age Limits Differ in Illicit Relationships

I have read this news item from the Arab Times several times. I don’t understand what it means. I don’t understand the goals of the lawsuit. I don’t understand the ramifications of the court’s decision.

Court upholds law on age limit in illicit relationship

KUWAIT CITY : The Constitutional Court Tuesday dismissed a petition filed by Attorney Mohamed Menwir Al-Mutairi requesting the court to declare item number 188/1 of the Kuwaiti Criminal Law unconstitutional. During a previous session, Al-Mutairi argued it is illogical to consider a teenage boy guilty and a young woman not guilty when they have sex if the boy is 18 years old while the woman is a few days less than 21 years. Al-Mutairi pointed out the Kuwaiti society has always considered a woman more aware of sexual matters than a man even if she is younger.

“However, the Criminal Procedures Law ruled otherwise in this case and declared a young boy guilty of the crime, without considering he can be forced to do it,” said Al-Mutairi. According to item number 188/1 of the Criminal Procedures Law, a man is responsible for his acts as soon as he reaches 18 years old while a woman is responsible only when she is 21. “This item is illogical as it contradicts our traditions and Sharia laws,” said Al-Mutairi. He submitted memos on the experts’ views on the issue to the court.

According to Sharia laws, there is no difference in penalty between a man and a woman who committed adultery, hence, the same principle should be applied on our laws,” Al-Mutairi explained. Item number 188/1 states that a woman is considered a victim in adultery cases if she is below 21 and a man is considered guilty in such cases if he is 18 years old. The session was presided over by Judge Rashid Al-Hammad.

By Moamen Al-Masri
Special to the Arab Times

June 11, 2008 - Posted by | Community, Cross Cultural, Family Issues, Kuwait, Living Conditions, Relationships, Social Issues

5 Comments »

  1. OK! I am lost! I read it twice and its not making sense to me!

    Ansam's avatar Comment by Ansam | June 11, 2008 | Reply

  2. meh …..

    I don’t think the kuwaiti legal system or the way we apply it was meant to be logical in the first place.

    I think it was designed to confuse people for the most part ….

    KTDP's avatar Comment by KTDP | June 11, 2008 | Reply

  3. It sounds like statutory rape laws. If a woman under 21 has sexual intercourse whether freely or by coercion, she is considered a victim.

    If the man she has sex with is over 18, he is old enough to be punished for the crime.

    This young man’s lawyer was arguing that the law is ridiculous, the court thought otherwise, so the law remains unchanged.

    cozysister's avatar Comment by cozysister | June 11, 2008 | Reply

  4. Cozy Sister – when I read it after reading your explanation, it sounds right. It also strikes me as funny – he, younger, is guilty, she, older, is innocent . . .

    intlxpatr's avatar Comment by intlxpatr | June 11, 2008 | Reply

  5. cozy sister is right, almutairi speaks about age limits in regards to stat rape. this is probably one of the first and only example of double standard reversal i have ever seen in kuwait.

    Mrm's avatar Comment by Mrm | June 11, 2008 | Reply


Leave a reply to Ansam Cancel reply